What the OOH Insider Summit Revealed About the Future of Out-Of-Home



Abby Sullivan, Associate Media Director

At the recent MediaPost OOH Insider Summit in Nashville, the conversation wasn’t just about billboards; it was about whether out-of-home advertising is ready to earn its seat at the performance table. One theme surfaced again and again: OOH has the reach and the creative power, but it’s been playing catch-up on measurement for years, and in a media landscape where every dollar needs to justify itself, that gap has real consequences.

The Industry’s Honest Reckoning

Dentsu set the tone early with a line that stuck: OOH has been bringing a showreel to a data fight. Out-of-home now represents just 2.3% of total advertising spend, down from 4%, and continues to lose ground as other channels have built closed-loop measurement, attribution models, and real-time optimization. The medium isn’t broken as attention is actually growing. But the inability to consistently prove downstream impact has made OOH an easy line item to cut when budgets tighten.

What the Data Actually Shows

Four Data Research brought six years of benchmark data (145,000+ survey responses across hundreds of campaigns) and the findings were both validating and uncomfortable. Creative Recall has climbed from 38% to 44%, and Ad Recall has nearly doubled from 18% to 29%. But lower-funnel metrics like Brand Opinion, Consideration, and Purchase Intent have been trending in the opposite direction. Reach is up. Lift is down.

The Human Edge

A session on OOH in 2031 offered a useful reframe for planners: AI will absorb the repetitive, execution-heavy work, but OOH remains uniquely dependent on human judgment. Whether it’s the read on a market, a neighborhood, or a moment, the nuanced instincts that make a placement feel right just aren’t automatable. As hard skills shift to AI, soft skills sharpen.

What We’ve Seen at Connelly Partners

On the final day, I had the opportunity to present our own experience making OOH work under real budget pressure. For the Museum of Fine Arts Boston, a strategy built around physical frequency and emotional connection drove significant increases in ticket sales both in the immediate launch window and year-over-year. The lesson: OOH performs best when treated as an accountable lower-funnel anchor and omnichannel multiplier, not a standalone awareness play.

The Road Ahead

OOH is at an inflection point. The creative case has always been strong. What’s catching up now is the data, and with it, the opportunity to reframe how OOH is planned and measured. Audience precision, category-level thinking, dynamic creative, and incrementality-focused measurement are the levers that will bring the medium back. The planners who build around those principles will be the ones defining what OOH looks like in 2031.

When Smaller Budgets Ask the Biggest Questions

Michelle Capasso, Partner & Chief Media Officer

I recently moderated a roundtable titled “The Role of OOH in Budget-Conscious Media Strategies” at the MediaPost OOH Insider Summit in Nashville. The premise was practical: how do you justify and maximize out-of-home when budgets are tight and every channel is fighting for the same budget?

While the large group started with that thought, where we ended up became something more interesting.

Within the first few minutes, the conversation moved past tactics. Formats, geography, dayparting. We landed pretty quickly on something nobody had explicitly come to discuss –  are we at risk of optimizing OOH into irrelevance?

The pressure is understandable. When budgets compress, every channel gets scrutinized. And OOH has always had a measurement problem relative to digital. No click, no cookie, no clean attribution path. So the natural response is to reach for programmatic buying, efficiency metrics, and CPM comparisons that make OOH look defensible in a media plan. My colleague, Abby Sullivan, called it the digital media security blanket in her presentation, and it’s a real thing. As an industry, it can be too easy to default to what is readily measurable, even when that measurement isn’t the whole story.

And that’s when the roundtable got really interesting. The same moves that make OOH easier to defend on paper also strip out the context, physical presence, and creative intentionality that make it work. You can buy OOH like a digital impression. The question the room kept circling was whether you should.

You could see this identity shift playing out in the summit itself. The partners in attendance looked noticeably different from even a few years ago. Programmatic partners, custom digital display vendors, audience buying platforms, and measurement companies sitting alongside the traditional OOH operators. That diversity is a good thing. It signals a category opening up to more advertisers, more budgets, and more use cases than the traditional billboard buy ever could. But it also accelerates the tension. The more OOH looks and trades like digital, the harder it becomes to preserve what makes it distinct: the physical scale, the environmental context, the presence that no algorithm can fully replicate.

OOH earns its impact by showing up in the real world in a way digital can’t. A bus wrap on a commuter route isn’t competing with a display ad for attention. It’s doing something different entirely. When you reduce it to a CPM and optimize accordingly, you’re not really buying OOH anymore. You’re buying a version of it that will underperform and confirm every skeptic’s priors.

The accountability conversation that came up in the roundtable wasn’t really about measurement tools. It was about making the case for what OOH actually does, and what role it plays in your media plan. 

The tension in that room isn’t going away. Budget pressure is real and the demand for accountability is fair. But the answer isn’t to make OOH behave like digital. It’s to measure what OOH actually moves: awareness, recall, physical confidence, bottom-funnel lift. And build the case from there.

The channel doesn’t need to justify itself by becoming something it isn’t. It needs better advocates for what it already is.

When a Soul Is Moved, All Is Forgiven

The Gift of Time: Outsourcing Influencer Management is Essential for Today’s Brands

Neal Malone, Director of Social Media, Influencer Marketing, and PR

For most people, hiring a house cleaner doesn’t feel right. Why would you pay someone a few hundred bucks every few weeks to complete the household tasks that you can do yourself? It’s an age-old question.

But then, life happens. The job becomes more demanding, the weekends get swallowed up by events and activities, and that full basket of laundry has been sitting at the bottom of the stairs for a week. 

Suddenly, outsourcing these tasks doesn’t seem so crazy anymore. People begin to realize that if they want to focus on their true priorities, hiring a house cleaner is an easy remedy. After all, it’s really time that they’re after—and time has significant value. 

You know what influencer marketing is? It’s a big, messy house that takes hours and hours to clean. And sure, brands can do it themselves without help from an outside agency—but at what cost? To truly maximize your investment in influencer partnerships, it takes time. So much time. I know this because my job is to absorb all that labor-intensive influencer work from clients so that they don’t have to remain in the weeds.

Hiring an agency like Connelly Partners to build and manage your influencer program is giving yourself the gift of time—and in turn, the ability to focus on other business priorities. Just like a house cleaner, our influencer expertise has a price tag, but brands are actively looking for ways to get internal hours back. And quite frankly, they’ve started to realize that the house sparkles that much more when you leave it to the professionals.

Ok, so you’ve decided to hire an agency to run your brand’s influencer program. Now what?

There are tons of influencer SaaS platforms and influencer-only agencies out there—and they’ll all sell you on access to a database of millions of influencers and a managed service offering. This type of big-box influencer assistance can totally work for large, established brands that are activating partners at massive scale. But for most other brands, a more hands-on approach is required. Budgets aren’t endless, campaigns are more niche, and brand awareness hasn’t even come close to reaching its peak, making it absolutely critical to find the right influencer partners. 

That right there, folks, is what makes Connelly Partners’ dedicated influencer practice different. 

Everything we do is customized to the client’s needs and goals, every influencer partner search is unique and based entirely on the campaign brief, and the team takes on every step of the process—from writing the brief and contracting influencers to shaping the content deliverables and measuring performance. Plus, as an integrated agency, our influencer programs are seamlessly weaved into paid social campaigns and measurement strategies, ensuring that the content is reaching target audiences and tracking towards all of the brand’s core KPIs.

That house cleaner is sounding a lot better now, isn’t it? Just do us a favor, though—when you go to make your agency hire, do your research. Don’t just look for the biggest name. Find someone who is actually going to dust the top half of the blinds and pull out the chairs when they vacuum. That’s what we do.

Gen Z in Their Own Words: Insights from Our Latest Women’s Panel

Maya Menon Freeman, Brand Strategist

For Connelly Partner’s most recent Women’s Networking Event, I moderated an incredibly thoughtful, candid panel of young professionals.

– Liliana Amato (Development Assistant, GBH)
– Kaitlin Curtis (Manager, Accounts, NEXT GEN·TEAM)
– Alexa Maddi (Former Content Writer, Amazon)
– Shruthi Krishnan (Copywriter, Education First)
– Jeanie Thompson (Associate Manager of Client Partnerships, Impact Media)
– Emily Farrell (Senior Marketing Associate, Brand, Gorton’s Seafood)

The intention was simple: create space for unfiltered perspectives that challenge generational assumptions. We got a look inside what moves Gen Z’s souls, and ultimately moves their feet to purchase. Here are the takeaways that have stayed with me:

Gen Z’s Favorite Brands Go Beyond Affinity

When panelists shared their favorite brands, the common thread wasn’t aesthetics or product quality, it was deep investment in their customer base. Gap felt like it was “talking with Gen Z, not talking at us,” and Guinness stood out for consistently giving back to its community. Topicals earned praise for formulating skincare “with melanated skin in mind first” and constantly improving from consumer feedback.

Gen Z doesn’t just want to buy from brands, they want to feel valued by them. This requires intentional effort to understand consumer mindsets, because when brands move people on a deeply human level, action naturally follows.

Authenticity Isn’t Dead, it’s the Litmus Test

This sparked one of the most nuanced debates of the evening: On one hand, there’s fatigue around recycled trends that has made authenticity feel hollow. But the counterpoint was sharper: Authenticity isn’t disappearing, it’s getting harder to fake. “Trying to be authentic is literally the opposite of authenticity,” one panelist noted, emphasizing how quickly Gen Z can detect when something feels manufactured.

The baseline isn’t performative relatability. It’s consistency, originality, and self-awareness.

Brands Need to Talk the Talk and Walk the Walk

Real trust comes from follow-through, and a brand’s refusal to engage with big issues means “you lose that human connection, and you’re not actually caring about the people that you’re making products for.” Whether it’s Topicals reformulating a serum based on feedback or brands protecting their workers, clear action supported by storytelling is what differentiates.

It’s important to note, subtlety can outperform spectacle. Brands like Patagonia, who embed their values into operations, often feel more credible than those loudly shouting them. 

Fulfillment Is the Ultimate Goal

For Gen Z, fulfillment isn’t a luxury, it’s a requirement. This shows up both in how they consume and how they work. It lives “in the small activities…your morning coffee…your evening run.” One panelist shared that they left a stable corporate role because it conflicted with personal values, choosing instead to “actually connect with humans again and do something I love.”

While this is often seen as disengagement, in truth it is a practice in intentionality. In a world of constant information and instability, fulfillment becomes a form of control and acts as a north star.

Trust Gen Z to Lead the Conversation

If you want to reach Gen Z, involve them meaningfully. “Don’t just have us present, have us involved entirely from start to finish.” Representation without influence is easy to spot, and campaigns can easily fail when Gen Z doesn’t have a seat at the table. 

Young people are increasingly undervalued in AI-driven environments, but to create work that resonates, you have to trust their voices. “Pick our brains…that’s why we’re there. If you want our fresh perspectives, just ask.”

Across different perspectives, it’s clear: Gen Z isn’t looking to be convinced, they want to be seen. They’re active participants who are quick to question, quicker to disengage, and determined to shape what comes next. By understanding what moves their souls, whether it’s authenticity, fulfillment, or trust, we can define the catalysts that truly move Gen Z’s feet.

Check out a clip from the event below!

Welcome to the Era of the Unpolished Brand

Jane Amendolara, Sr. Public Relations, Social Media, & Influencer Marketing Manager

There’s no secret sauce to brand success, but there was a time when polished content was the gold standard. Perfectly staged shots, 100% branded messaging, and scripted lines were how brands proved they were “serious.” Scroll through a Gen Z social feed today, though, and that level of polish often reads as stiff, distant, or … try-hard.

It’s not a sudden change. Social-first platforms have steadily nudged audience expectations toward a more unpolished, authentic style. While polish still has a time and place across the broader marketing mix, what was quietly emerging is now unmistakable in 2026: on social, relatability beats perfection every time.

Welcome to the era of the unpolished brand, where scrappy is the new serious.

Gen Z grew up online. They know what “real” content looks like because they make it themselves in minutes. They can spot a scripted or overproduced video in half a second. It’s not about production quality; it’s about authenticity. Overly polished content can make a brand feel like it’s managing perception rather than participating in culture. And participation? That’s what Gen Z actually values.

TikTok didn’t just change the look of content. Over the last several years, it’s changed the feel of it. Brands aren’t just competing with other brands anymore; they’re competing with a five-second meme, a chaotic storytime, or a random relatable comment that somehow lands perfectly. The algorithm rewards resonance, relatability, and timing. Not polish.

All of this means it’s time to rethink the brand book. Social-first brands need a new layer of guardrails that let teams move fast, lean into humor, respond in real time, and flex with trends. It’s not chaos. It’s strategic looseness, where the post is only the start. That’s because real engagement happens when a brand participates by joking along, acknowledging feedback, or even using the comment section as creative inspiration for future content. Huge brands like Dunkin’, for example, do this all the time, by sharing memes and posts that look like a five-year-old could have created them on an iPad. That’s how brands become relatable; they lean into the joke to build a real connection.

Scrappy content doesn’t mean you’re being lazy. Done right, it signals confidence: “We get the platform. We trust our team. We’re here to participate, take risks, and show up in unexpected ways.” When a brand intentionally lets go of perfection, the payoff isn’t just likes or shares. It’s cultural relevance.

Is Your Dashboard Reporting Growth or Just Noise?

Jen Hansen, Director of Analytics

Most CMOs are making million-dollar decisions based on fiction.

If your GA4 is showing “Unassigned” traffic, sampled data, or a disconnect between ROAS and bottom-line revenue, you don’t have a marketing problem—you have a data architecture problem. But on a deeper level, you have a connection issue: you can’t see if you’re actually reaching people.

The Reality: Your Tracking Is Leaking Revenue

The shift to GA4 left most brands with a “Frankenstein” setup: bloated Google Tag Manager (GTM) containers, duplicate triggers, and broken attribution paths. This isn’t just “messy data”—it’s a blind spot that hides where your customers are actually dropping off.

We recently audited a premier retailer with 900 million annual events. Their data was so noisy they couldn’t see that their final purchase step had a staggering 87% abandonment rate. Something was stopping customers in their tracks.

The Diagnostic Audit

You wouldn’t greenlight a $500k media spend based on a “hunch.” Why rely on a tracking setup you haven’t verified?

Our Analytics Audit is designed to transform raw data into Actionable Intelligence. We don’t just look for broken tags; we perform deep behavioral analysis to find the “Why” behind the “What”:

Stop Guessing. Start Scaling.

More Than A Moment: Designing the Gorton’s Shrimp and Cocktail Experience at SXSW 2025

Abby Peterson, Creative Director/Brand Activation Specialist

yellow house with people outside

Each March, hundreds of thousands of people descend on Austin for South by Southwest, featuring seven days of connection, discovery, and culture-shaping creativity. SXSW is best known for its conferences and festivals that celebrate the convergence of tech, film, music, education, and culture. It’s known as the place for discovering the next big thing.

“It’s been called a rite of passage, a whirlwind, and even a new world. But above all else, SXSW is a stage for storytellers, a platform for boundary-pushers, and a place where authenticity and innovation thrive.” – SPIN Magazine

With over 450 brands activating at the festival each year, it’s one of the hardest environments for a brand to stand out. Everyone is competing for the attention of a highly influential audience (one that is famously resistant to being sold to). To succeed here, brands must earn the attention, not demand it. 

To create that lasting impact, we couldn’t half-ass it. Flopping on a stage of this magnitude was not an option. If our event didn’t blow away our audience, they’d leave with a worse opinion of the brand. So we decided to host a massive party far from coastal New England Gloucester all the way in Austin, TX.

We brought Gorton’s Shrimp & Cocktail to life through a full branded house takeover on Rainey Street, creating an authentic slice of Gloucester infused with Austin’s energy. The home was wrapped in Gorton’s bold and iconic yellow, instantly recognizable from the street, while a massive ship’s wheel archway welcomed guests inside.

The visual design had to be clever and aesthetic enough to surprise our audience, leading to sharing the Gorton’s brand into the world as walking advocates. 

Signage and merch included things like shrimp being lassoed and lines like “Ahoy, cowboy!” and “This is, in fact, my first rodeo.” We carried the theme through every last detail, down to the “Buoys” and “Gulls” bathroom signs, and a menu of custom cocktails inspired by the New England brand. (Cape Ann Codder, anyone?)  

Every element of the event needed to foster that feeling of connection, community, and discovery that we know this younger audience craves. Up and coming bands played throughout the day in the front yard. Our Shrimp Shack served tacos, sliders, and shrimp samples paired with custom cocktails, while daily live cooking demonstrations from popular influencer @theShaySpence showcased how simple and modern the product could be. Each room offered a unique interactive moment. An analog photobooth encouraged guests to pin photos to the wall to create a living mosaic of the diverse community who experience the brand. A hands-on activity dispenser sparked spontaneous interaction between guests.

When an experience creates surprise, warmth, or connection, it stops being marketing and starts becoming a memory.

We had a line down the block all day, both days of the event. Beyond Texas we had millions of social impressions before, during, and after the event. Attendees didn’t just share content. They endorsed the brand, signaling to their own communities that Gorton’s is full of unexpected possibilities.

This was more than a branded activation. It was a cultural moment and a powerful step forward for a brand ready to evolve. We transformed a brand once seen as predictable and outdated to one that shows up in surprising and culturally relevant ways, on people’s plates and in their lives. 

That’s what it means to move souls in order to move feet.

If AI Is the Answer, What Was the Question?

Michele Hart-Henry, Managing Director, CP Health

Having recently returned from the annual health technology conference, ViVE, in Los Angeles, I would summarize the atmosphere as expensive and slightly confused. Between the sprawling, multi-space booths and the high-end giveaways, the investment in “the future of health” is staggering. 

Yet, walking the floor, I noticed a curious paradox: for all the capital being poured into the room, many players struggled to articulate exactly what they do for the people at the center of the ecosystem, or why they do it.

AI was, predictably, the oxygen of the conference. It was everywhere. But as I sat through sessions and navigated the show floor, it became clear to me that we are in danger of building a very expensive, sophisticated house without ever asking the residents who will live in it what they need.

We are obsessed with how to solve healthcare’s problems with AI, but I’m not sure which of healthcare’s myriad problems we’re addressing. At the same time, I fear we’re neglecting the who and the why.

Are we reducing stress and burnout in clinicians? Are we making it easier for health systems to accurately bill payers, or to plan for capacity issues? Are we making it less expensive to answer routine questions and phone inquiries? Are we making it quicker to find clinical trials? Are we connecting home devices to remote patient monitoring tools? The answer to all of these questions, and many others like them, is yes. That’s exactly why all of these companies come to conferences like ViVE or HIMSS. 

But why? Why are we doing this? And most importantly, for whom are we doing this? At Connelly Partners, we believe that if you start with humans at the center, their fears, their language, and their motivations, the technology finds its rightful place as a high-powered assistant.

The Inclusion Gap: About Them, Not With Them

One of my biggest takeaways from the week is that AI is currently being built in a vacuum. Most Large Language Models (LLMs) are trained on data written by clinicians and researchers. While that’s great for clinical accuracy, it creates a language divide. Clinicians and patients don’t speak the same language, nor do they share the same priorities.

We see this in the development process: too much AI is being created about the patient, but not with the patient. If we don’t include the consumer in the co-creation process, we risk building “solutions” that are technically brilliant but practically alienating. For example, ambient transcription is a godsend for reducing clinician burnout, and we should celebrate that, but are we sharing those insights with the patient? Are we using that technology to help the patient see the “whole picture” of their own health, or is it just another way to automate a back-office task?

The Data Silo Problem (Again)

It’s 2026, and we’re still talking about interoperability. Even within the same platforms, the mountains of data we’re collecting don’t always talk to each other.

More importantly, we are ignoring a goldmine of unstructured data. Patient-supplied notes, journals, and lived-experience observations often stay outside the system. Yet this “subjective” data is often the most vital context for healthcare, helping people live their most fulfilled lives. If AI can’t digest the patient’s voice alongside the clinician’s expertise, it isn’t really “intelligent.” It’s just a fast filing cabinet.

At the conference, I observed three divergent tracks of AI:

  1. The Enterprise Track: Tools built for and by health systems to streamline operations, which were much more prevalent.
  2. The Clinician Track: Tools intended to make it easier for practitioners to do their jobs while reducing administrative burden.
  3. The Consumer Track: Tools patients use independently to increase their health literacy, the builders of which were clustered among the startups at the fringe aisles of the larger players.

The concerning point? These worlds aren’t harmonized. Dr. Google is dead; long live Dr. AI. Consumers are already using conversational AI as their first entry point into the health journey. They are turning to AI “companions” to explain their labs or symptoms before they ever call a doctor, or to translate what a doctor told them. If the healthcare system doesn’t keep up and find a way to bridge these tracks, the gap between “system-speak,” “clinician-speak,” and “patient-reality” will only widen.

Moving Toward “More Birthdays”

It wasn’t all tech for tech’s sake, though. There were moments of genuine clarity that reminded me why we do this work.

City of Hope, for example, shared how they are using AI to bring clinical trial opportunities directly to the bedside. By giving doctors the ability to find and recommend trials in the moment, they aren’t just “optimizing a workflow”—they are living up to their mission of providing “More Birthdays.”

The Architecture of Care: Tool vs. Foundation

It feels as though we are treating AI as if it is the healthcare system, when in reality, it should simply be the scaffolding that allows ALL humans in the system to function better. When we prioritize the “How” (the algorithm) over the “Who” (the patient and practitioner) and the “Why” (the outcome), we build a system that is technically efficient but emotionally bankrupt.

My take on all of this is simple: Technology should make the invisible visible. It should capture the patient’s whispered concerns in unstructured data, bridge the literacy gap between clinician-speak and care-delivery-reality, and automate the mundane so that the human connection can flourish.

More AI isn’t the answer. Thoughtfully designed, co-created tools are. AI should be used to eliminate the friction faced by ALL humans when navigating and operating in the healthcare world. Not just patients. Not just doctors. All humans. And as such, all humans (not just those charged with lowering costs) should be part of the discussion that identifies where the friction is and how AI can help.

After all, the most expensive booth in the world can’t buy the trust that comes from finally feeling seen, heard, and understood. That isn’t a tech problem; it’s a human one.

SOUL MOVERS: Episode 1: Debo Ray

In an age defined by algorithms and automation, there’s still one thing no machine can replicate: the power to move the human soul.

Soul Movers is a series of short films that explores that rare, electric force behind the people who move us. From Grammy-nominated vocalists and famous chefs to magicians, dancers, and speechwriters, these are the humans who remind us what it means to feel something real.

Each film explores what defines us at Connelly Partners, and our core belief: If you want to move customers’ feet, you have to first move their souls.